Trade-offs, Transitivity, and Temkin †
نویسندگان
چکیده
The last few years have seen a number of new and important publications in moral theory. Arguably none more important than Larry S. Temkin’s Rethinking the Good: Moral Ideals and the Nature of Practical Reasoning. This fascinating work highlights and explores in depth a seemingly fundamental inconsistency in our own axiological beliefs. Put roughly, the inconsistency arises given our general willingness to make small trade-offs among individual goods and their distribution among people (such as our willingness to trade-off a slightly larger headache for one individual for the sake of preventing slightly smaller headaches for two individuals), our general unwillingness to subject small numbers of people to very large harms to prevent very minor harms to many people (such as causing a single person fifty years of torturous pain for the sake of preventing very minor headaches for a very large number of people), and the transitivity of “better than”, i.e., the claim that if A is better than B and B is better than C, then A must be better than C. This tension is no revelation.1 What is a revelation is the doggedness with which Temkin pursues his inquiry into it, and the depths he is able to plunge. And while I do not believe the book is flawless, it is nevertheless extremely, well, important : it contains a number of groundbreaking discussions of the nature of the good, the nature of evaluative ideals, and the extent to which we should hedge our bets concerning the transitivity of the predicate “better than”. Furthermore, I admire this book because it has that ever-so-rare property of philosophical texts: it is actually convincing, at least convincing enough to convince me that the status of the “better than” predicate is a substantive matter, the intransitivity of which may well
منابع مشابه
Ethical Perspective: Five Unacceptable Trade-offs on the Path to Universal Health Coverage
This article discusses what ethicists have called “unacceptable trade-offs” in health policy choices related to universal health coverage (UHC). Since the fiscal space is constrained, trade-offs need to be made. But some trade-offs are unacceptable on the path to universal coverage. Unacceptable choices include, among other examples from low-income countries, to expand coverage for services wit...
متن کاملDefining Pathways and Trade-offs Toward Universal Health Coverage; Comment on “Ethical Perspective: Five Unacceptable Trade-offs on the Path to Universal Health Coverage”
The World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) World Health Report 2010, “Health systems financing, the path to universal coverage,” promoted universal health coverage (UHC) as an aspirational objective for country health systems. Yet, in addition to the dimensions of services and coverage, distribution of coverage in the population, and financial risk protection highlighted by the report, the conside...
متن کاملA one-model approach for Computation of congestion With productions trade-offs and weight restrictions
متن کامل
Universal Health Coverage – The Critical Importance of Global Solidarity and Good Governance; Comment on “Ethical Perspective: Five Unacceptable Trade-offs on the Path to Universal Health Coverage”
This article provides a commentary to Ole Norheim’ s editorial entitled “Ethical perspective: Five unacceptable trade-offs on the path to universal health coverage.” It reinforces its message that an inclusive, participatory process is essential for ethical decision-making and underlines the crucial importance of good governance in setting fair priorities in healthcare. Solidarity on both natio...
متن کاملCoronavirus: Where Has All the Health Economics Gone?
As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to unfold there is an untold number of trade-offs being made in every country around the globe. The experience in the United Kingdom and Canada to date has not seen much uptake of health economics methods. We provide some thoughts on how this could take place, specifically in three areas. Firstly, this can involve understanding the i...
متن کامل